Three Minute Bible

With this he went out again to the Jews gathered there and said, ”I find no basis for a charge against him.”

At this point in the conversation, Pilate was likely irritated or frustrated.

Pilate was in a tough spot. In front of him was someone innocent of any wrongdoing by normal standards. Outside of the palace were the people Pilate was supposed to be governing. These particular people, the Jews, were not like other people that the Romans had conquered. These people were stubborn and stiff-necked. They were not easily cowed. They resented their Roman overseers and it was not uncommon for members of their race to form groups and rebel. Today, instead of rebelling, they were using their Roman governor to do their dirty work and have someone killed. Pilate didn’t like this situation one bit.

To his credit, Pilate is not indifferent to the truth, or the fate of an innocent man.

Pilate could have taken the easy road and simply given in to what the Jews were asking of him. Instead, he finishes his interview with Jesus and he goes out to face them with a report that they will not like: “I find no basis for a charge against him.”

Pilate understands enough about truth to know it when he sees it. He may not understand fully who Jesus is, but he recognizes his innocence of wrongdoing. By some means we cannot see, he concludes that the crowd outside is lying about this man, Jesus. Instead of conforming to the crowd, Pilate proclaims the truth.

Application: Pilate is in a tough spot. This is possibly the toughest spot in the history of tough spots. On one hand is Jesus, the embodiment of truth, love, mercy, peace, and joy. On the other hand is the crowd, a witches’ brew of deceit, anger, envy, hate, and enmity. Standing up for truth is hard, yet Pilate is willing to make the effort, not for personal gain, but because it is the right thing to do.

Food for Thought: How would this story about the crucifixion be different if Pilate had not cared about the truth?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “Truth Proclaimed – John 18: 38b”

”In fact, the reason I was born and came into the world is to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.”
”What is truth?” retorted Pilate.

What is truth? Pilate’s question is simple, yet profound.

In the world Pilate lives in, truth changes depending on who is in charge. If the Romans are in charge, then their idea of truth is what people use. If Pilate had been a slave in a world ruled by a Jewish king, then the rules that king espoused would be his idea of truth. Political truth is a matter of power. The strongest political force gets to define reality.

We see this played out in the Old Testament. Good kings recognized the truth of God and honored him. Bad kings said truth was worshipping foreign gods or idols of wood and metal.

From a spiritual perspective, truth is not affected by politics or power. Truth is what is. God exists and the truth of that claim will be self-evident to everyone when they pass from this life to the next. The truth of God’s word is self-evident to people who recognize the reality of God. The truth of who Jesus is and what he said and did will also stand the test of time.

Application: Truth is not the same thing as belief or knowledge. A person can “know” something they read or heard, and they might believe that it is true, but that doesn’t make it true. Only by knowing God can we hope to understand what is true. (Proverbs 1: 7)

Food for Thought: What truth was Jesus born to testify to?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “Truth Revisited – John 18: 37c – 38a”

Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king.”

Once again we are caught up in the back-and-forth between Pilate and Jesus.

Pilate asks, “Are you the king of the Jews?

Jesus answers, “Is that your own idea?”

Pilate responds, “Am I a Jew?”

Jesus says, “My kingdom is not of this world.”

Pilate says, “You are a king, then!”

Jesus replies, “You say that I am a king.”

If the topic wasn’t so serious, it would almost sound like an old vaudeville act. One reason Jesus cannot come out directly and claim to be a king is that Pilate has no context for understanding what kind of king Jesus is. The word “king” does not really begin to describe the power and majesty of Jesus. If Pilate understood who Jesus was, he would not be able to proceed with the crucifixion.

Application: We live in a world that is blind to the reality of Jesus and who he is. When we testify about Jesus it helps to keep that in mind. People in the world will need help understanding who Jesus is.

Food for Thought: How would you describe the kind of king that Jesus is?

Bonus Question: Are there any other reasons why Jesus would not confirm to Pilate that his is a king?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “A Kind of King – John 18: 37b”

”You are a king, then!” said Pilate.

In the prior verse, Jesus admits to having a kingdom, even though it is not of this world. Pilate hears this and then, perhaps in surprise, says, “You are a king, then!”

Being in the presence of a king is not a small thing. Kings represent people, and what happens to the king affects all the king’s people. Like the game of chess, if you capture the king you have won the game.

Not all kings fought, of course. Some kings were content to manage their kingdom and respect the neighboring kings around them. Sometimes they would get together and hobnob in kingly fashion. Occasionally they would create alliances so that if one king was attacked the other kings would come to their aid.

Jesus does not threaten Pilate, so Pilate can afford to be intrigued by him. Who is this man and why is he so hated by his people? Is he crazy? The people outside of the palace shouting that Jesus must die seemed a lot crazier. Amid all the Jewish insanity, the man Jesus seemed saner than anyone. Yet here he is, calmly talking with Pilate, about a kingdom that is not of this world.

I think Pilate must have liked the idea of someone as lowly, humble and non-threatening as Jesus being called king of the Jews. Perhaps it amused him. The idea of Jesus as king irritated the chief priests and other Jewish leaders. That fact alone might have been appealed to Pilate. Was Jesus crazy? No, I don’t think Pilate entertained that thought. Was Jesus different? Yes. Pilate was keenly aware that Jesus was a different kind of Jew than he had ever met before.

The solution, for Pilate, was that Jesus was a kind of imaginary king. Not a real king in the worldly sense. His followers had scattered and were not a threat. Jesus himself was not a threat. Pilate had been told he claimed to be a king and Jesus himself agreed with this claim with the caveat that his kingdom was not of this world.

“Okay,” thinks Pilate. “You are a king, then!”

Application: Pilate does not understand that there is life beyond this earthly life. As Christians, we accept that God is real and that there is a real life after death where Jesus will be our visible Lord and King.

Food for Thought: What happens in our lives when we realize that Pilate was right about Jesus being king?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “King Jesus – John 18: 37”

Jesus said, ‘’My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders. But now my kingdom is from another place.”

The test of a threat for a man in Pilate’s position is whether or not the accused is inclined to fight. A man who is inclined to fight whether by physical force or political intrigue is a threat. People so inclined are generally aggressive, prideful, arrogant people. Sometimes they are boastful. Other times they might be deceitful, guarded, evasive. Jesus was none of these things. He did not meet the test of being a threat to Pilate or anyone else.

Pilate’s first question to Jesus after he had summoned him into the palace was, “Are you the king of the Jews?” Jesus responded by asking his own questions. He was unimpressed by the fact that Pilate was standing in judgment over him. They exchange a few more words, and then Pilate asks, “What is it you have done?”

In response, Jesus answers the first question and says, ‘’My kingdom is not of this world.”

That is an interesting response, but certainly not a threat. But what does he mean? Pilate must have at least understood that Jesus meant he had no ambitions of power here on earth. Going back to the Test, there is still the question of Jesus’ disciples. Do they agree with their master on this point?

Jesus answers Pilate’s unspoken question saying that if his kingdom were of this world, his servants would, “fight to prevent my arrest by the Jewish leaders.” In a sense, Jesus invites Pilate to look closely at him. Is he struggling? Is he resisting? Is he making threats? No. None of that. Jesus and Pilate might be conversing over tea out on the veranda for all the concern Jesus shows over his future.

In this short exchange, Jesus answers Pilate’s question, passes the test, and opens the door to a kingdom not of this world.

Application: If we choose to model our lives after Jesus, we choose to focus on the same kingdom he was focused on. The things of this world do not matter because His kingdom is not of this world.

Food for Thought: If you were to stand before Pilate would he consider you a threat? Why or why not?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “The Test – John 18: 36”

”Is that your own idea,” Jesus asked, ”or did others talk to you about me?”
”Am I a Jew?” Pilate replied. ”Your own people and chief priests handed you over to me. What is it you have done?”

Yesterday in “Threat” we posed the question: Where did Pilate hear that Jesus claimed to be king of the Jews? Today Jesus responds in a rather uncharacteristic way. Jesus asks Pilate where he got the idea about him being king of the Jews. If we assume that Jesus already knows the answer to his question, then his question seems intended to get Pilate (and us) to think.

Instead of answering Jesus, Pilate comes back at Jesus with another question. His response is, in effect, an affirmation of the differences between him and Jesus. Finally, he gets down to a practical question, but one that he should not have had to ask.

”What is it you have done?”

It is like both of them are caught in a kind of nightmare. Jesus, arrested for simply being who he is. Pilate is the judge and jury in a trial where no one will tell him what the person on trial has done wrong.

Somehow, in this whirling cauldron of political intrigue, Jesus is the bad guy. Pilate has been led to believe that the Jews are accusing Jesus of political insurrection. The problem is that Jesus doesn’t look the part. He has done nothing to threaten the Romans even though the Jewish leaders feel threatened.

What is it, Jesus, that you have done?

Is Pilate is expecting Jesus to explain what all the fuss is about? Even under Roman law, it was the responsibility of the accuser to explain their accusations. The Jews have not even done that.

Application: In this passage, we see the dramatic difference between the world’s approach to a problem and God’s approach. Jesus offers Pilate a chance to reconsider his implied accusation. Pilate offers Jesus the affirmation that he is hated by his own people. Then Pilate offers Jesus a chance to provide evidence against himself. When the world rejects you, think of Jesus’ calm assurance in his relationship with God.

Food for Thought: If Pilate had answered Jesus’ question what would have changed in this story?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “Nightmare – John 18: 34-35”

”But we have no right to execute anyone,” they objected. This took place to fulfill what Jesus had said about the kind of death he was going to die.

When Pilate told the Jewish leaders to take Jesus away and “judge him by your own law,” they whined in response, “but we have no right to execute anyone.”

Execute??

That word had to get Pilate’s attention. Something was going on and it was something he didn’t understand. Why were these people so agitated? Who was this man who they had brought to him? Why this talk about executing someone?

The Romans of Jesus’ day were not primitive savages. They were actually quite advanced in the application of the law and reason. The measure of a society is not its technology, rather it is the moral quality of its people. While Romans could be brutal (we see this in the eventual execution of Jesus) they could also be concerned with the application of justice.

Perhaps Pilate’s first instinct was to avoid dealing with someone else’s problem. Maybe to him, the Jews were a kind of a pain in the neck. Regardless, when the Jews mention execution, two things happen. The first is that they get Pilate’s attention. The second is that they foretell the fulfillment of the prophecy about the death that Jesus would suffer

Application: God has ways of getting our attention. Whether it is a beautiful summer’s day or a rear-end collision in the middle of a busy intersection, God is there. He wants you to pay attention to Him. Not because he needs your attention, but because when we pay attention to God everything falls into place.

Food for Thought: As a Christian, how do you prepare for a situation like the one that Pilate found himself in?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “Situations – John 18: 31b-32”

Pilate said, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.”

Pilate might be a lot of things but one of them isn’t stupid. He smells something fishy as soon as the Jewish leaders open their mouths. His response is quick and business-like.

If they had brought him someone who had murdered people, or had stolen from the Romans, or was a known threat to the Romans, he might have been interested. Instead, they brought him a simple carpenter from Galilee. He looked a bit beat up but he didn’t look scary.

Pilate had been around enough to be able to tell who was trouble and who was not just by looking at them. Jesus was mildly interesting to him because he just stood there. He didn’t look scared nor did he look belligerent. He simply stood there. Meanwhile, the Jewish leaders were agitated. They were jumping up and down shaking their fists in the air and pointing at Jesus. They were madder than the proverbial wet hen. Though he couldn’t make out most of the words they were saying, he could see that they were so mad that they were spitting as they angrily spoke over each other.

It was an amazing contrast! The man who was tied up standing calming in the middle of the crowd. The crowd, acting like they should be tied up. Pilate knew right away that he didn’t want any of this situation to get on him.

”Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.”

Application: For those who know Jesus personally we can take some encouragement from him. In the middle of seemingly hopeless situations, we can look to Jesus, the calm in the middle of the storm. Knowing what he did for us, helps us put what we go through into perspective. Eternal perspective.

Food for Thought: At this point in the story, Pilate could probably see that the Jewish leaders were agitated about something. It was early in the morning. I doubt Pilate had even had his coffee yet, or the Roman version of coffee. He wanted nothing to do with this situation, but God had other plans. How do you respond when God pulls you into his plans and it is not going a direction you want it to go?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “Contrast – John 18: 31”

So Pilate came out to them and asked, ‘’What charges are you bringing against this man?”
‘’If he were not a criminal,” they replied, ‘’we would not have handed him over to you.”

The phrase “non sequitur” is Latin and means “it does not follow.” If a parent tells their son to clean up his room and he responds, “It is dark outside!” That is an example of a non sequitur. There is no relationship between the first statement and the one that follows it.

On the surface, the response given to Pilate seems related to his question. After all, criminals are criminals because they have been charged with a crime and found to be guilty. In this case, everything is mixed up. The Jewish leaders are asking Pilate to judge a man that they have already judged. In effect, they are not so much asking Pilate to pass judgment as they are asking (demanding, really…) him to rubber-stamp the judgment they have already rendered. And so their answer to him comes across as a non sequitur.

Pilate: What are the charges against this man (so that I know what kind of judgment I need to make).

Jews: Charges smarges. All you need to know is that he is a criminal because we say so.

The Jews want Jesus dead. If they were in charge of their own country as in the days of old, they would simply kill Jesus as they did to the prophets who came before him. But times have changed, if they kill Jesus, they are the guilty of breaking Roman law and subject to punishment. So the only option open to them is to have the Romans kill Jesus for them.

These opening lines of the conversation between Pilate and the Jews set the stage for what is to come. Pilate is trying to be reasonable. The Jews want nothing to do with reason. They know that they have no rational argument with which to convict him under Roman law. Blinded by their resentment towards Jesus they resort to pure political force. As their opening statement to Pilate suggests, whatever else happens, logic and reason will have nothing to do with it.

Personal Application: We live in a world where the kind of non sequitur we see in this story happens all the time. Political forces seek to manipulate people with fear instead of reason. It is so prevalent these days that it is sometimes difficult to know what or who to believe. Thank God for God! When we need to find our bearings in life, we can always turn to Him. Scripture says, ‘’The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding.” (Proverbs 9:10)

Food for Thought: When you are confronted by something that doesn’t make sense, how do you respond? What would you advise others to do? What would you have suggested Pilate do?

Please click “Continue Reading” for comments.

Continue reading “Non Sequitur (II) – John 18: 29”